Hera, home. HERA help

  1. Data for the validation
  2. Selection of the point to validate
  3. Validating each checkpoint
  4. Procedures
  5. Instructions
  6. Register result
  7. Generate report
  8. Choose another point
  9. Su HERA-XP

Data for the validation

Write your name.
This information is optional, but it is useful if you will want to return to your work later.
Write the address of the page to be tested.
Use a complete URI to identify the page.
For example: http://www.sidar.org/index.php.
Choose the order of presentation for the checkpoints from the Accessibility Guidelines:
  • Numbering: All the checkpoints in their numerical order.
  • Elements: All the checkpoints, grouped according to types of structure.
  • Priority 1: Only the checkpoints of priority 1.
  • Priority 2: Only the checkpoints of priority 2.
  • Priority 3: Only the checkpoints of priority 3.
(You can change this ordering preference later.)
Use the button "Start" to continue.
If there are no errors in the data, the page will open to choose each checkpoint for evaluation.

Note: Before beginning the work, HERA will check that it is possible to open the page indicated. If not, it will re-present the first form, asking for the information to be corrected.

Selection of the point to validate

  1. Page contains one or several tables with checkpoints form Accesibility Guidelines for Web Content 1.0, according to the chosen order.
  2. The first column contains a button identified with the corresponding checkpoint, the second column contains the complete text about the checkpoint.
  3. If there exists any saved registries, it appears an icon besides the corresponding checkpoint, to indicate it has already been reviewed.Reviewed.
  4. To proceed to the review of a checkpoint, activate the corresponding button.
  5. You can re-order the presentation of checkpoints, by numbering, by elements to be reviewd or by priorities.

Validating each checkpoint

  1. After header, it appears in the first place, the complete text of the checkpoint from Accessibility Guidelines and it´s priority.
  2. Procedures Button: Shows and explains the tools to review the checkpoint.
  3. Instructions: Indicates what to take in account when making the review of each point.
  4. Results noting: (optional) If you wish to carry a registry of the results of revision, you can use this form.
  5. Write Report: Once finished the review of all points, if you have registered your observations, you can use this form to generate an inform page.
  6. Choose another checkpoint: Shows the complete list of checkpoints.


  1. "Procedures" box contains one or several buttons which represent the tools to be used (these buttons opens the page that is being reviewed in a new window)
    • icono con el logo de Sidar. Tools identified with Sidar´s icon consist, most of them, in cascade stylesheets (CSS) applied to the chosen page in order make the review easier. It indicates in each case the elements identified with the CSS.
    • W3C logo icon. To review some checkpoints, HERA connects directly with W3C validation tools, the document sintax validator and the CSS´ validator.
    • Cynthia logo icon. To review some checkpoints, HERA connects directly to Cynthia, which is prepared to simplify those reviews.
    • Magnifier. For some checkpoints a magnifier is shown and the "visual" text. It indicates the only way to review that checkpoint is by watching those elements in the page.
  2. if it appears the Remove Author´s style option it menas that, besides applying HERA review Stylesheet, if this checkbox is marked, author-defined styles will be removed from page.
    Depending on the case, this option could help to identify the elements that need to be reviewed (for example, invisible images) or avoid elements with absolute positions to flap with the CSS messages.
  3. Complementary tools:
    • Show original pageDisplays in a new window the page as it was originally designed by its author. This can be useful tho check naviagation issues and dynamic elements in general.
    • Page source (original). In some cases it´s necessary to analyse the code of the page being reviewd. This option displays the code without modifications, numbering each line of the file.
    • Page source (formatted). Similar to the previous option, but using different background colors and layers to simplify the identifications of structural elements (this operation tends to delay more than the other one).

The views of the original page or the source will open in a new window as it will be necessary to make comparisons.


The instructions detail all the aspects that you should keep in mind when revising each checkpoint.

In some cases they contain detailed procedures for evaluating the checkpoint. In others only ideas and general advice expanding on the concepts of each checkpoint.

Register result

  1. The form allows to register the results appreciated when reviewing some checkpoint.
  2. It appears, in first place, a selection field with 6 (six) options: "Not reviewed", "Yes", "No", "Partially", "Don´t Know" and "Not applicable", to give an answer if the page complies with the checkpoint reviewed.
  3. One text field to write a comment, optional, about the results of the application of the reviewed point.
  4. After clicking "Send" button, if data has been correctly registered in database, it appears a confirmation message with all data stored.

You can also leava checkpoint "Not Reviewed" but to write a comment. This point, even with the comment, will still figure as pending of review.

Generate report

Choose another point

The button "Choose another Checkpoint" will take you to the page for selecting checkpoints

There is also a drop-down menu that shows all the checkpoints for which no result is recorded. Use this if you don't want to check the entire list.


Hera-XP screenshotHERA-XP is a limited HERA, meant for someone who needs to test one or two checkpoints, but does not need a report, nor to do a full evaluation of a page or site.

In this version, you simply provide the page address (URI), click the button "Accept", and follow the same procedure as with HERA.

HERA-XP offers the same options and functionalities as its big sister, but does not keep any results, and so cannot generate a report.

HERA-XP funciona básicamente igual que HERA, las únicas diferencias son: En la página principal, no cuenta con un campo para indicar el nombre del revisor; y en la barra de opciones, en vez de un botón para anotar el resultado y otro para generar el informe, cuenta con un campo para cambiar, en cualquier momento, la dirección de la página que se quiere revisar. Por ello, el icono de ayuda en HERA-XP, lleva a esta página, en la que se encuentra toda la información sobre el funcionamiento de HERA que es igualmente aplicable a HERA-XP, con las excepciones antes mencionadas.

[ Home | Aiuto | Info | Contact ]

© Copyright 2003. Sidar, home page. [Sidar logo]